Therapeutic Efficacy of Potassium Citrate for Treating Less Than 10-Millimeter Renal Stones

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Pars Advanced And Minimally Invasive Medical Manners Research Center, Pars Hospital, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Geriatric Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Introduction: To assess the therapeutic efficacy of potassium citrate in the nonsurgical management of renal stones we run this research. The prophylactic effects of Potassium Citrate over renal stone formation have been established but there is still a gap for its therapeutic effect.
Methods: A written informed consent was given to the patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were interested in participation. Eventually 56 patients (Mean age= 43.7 ± 10.8) from June 2018 to December 2018 with a total of 86 renal stones enrolled in the study and treated with potassium citrate (10 mEq Alithoral, Nooria Darman Pasargad, tablets, three times a day). Moreover, the patients were recommended to reduce sodium intake as well as oxalate-rich foods, have at least 2 liters of water per day and normalize calcium intake. Finally, they were assessed 8 weeks after the treatment initiation, while in those whose stones were remained, the assessments repeated for another 8-week.
Results: Based on our findings, 42 and 25 stones were completely dissolved at the first and second visit, respectively. Compared to the baseline parameters, the mean size of stones in the largest diameter decreased significantly from 5.13 to 1.96 mm and 5.13 to 0.79 mm (p-value<0.001) at the first and second visit, respectively.
Conclusion: Potassium citrate plays a crucial role in pulverizing and also reduction of the dimensions of the renal stone. Therefore, apart from the prevention of renal stones recurrence, potassium citrate can be used in favor of treating renal stones.

Graphical Abstract

Therapeutic Efficacy of Potassium Citrate for Treating Less Than 10-Millimeter Renal Stones

Highlights

  • The prophylactic effects of Potassium Citrate on the stone formations are established.
  • Potassium citrate has the efficacy of Potassium Citrate for treating less than 10-millimeter renal stones
  • Potassium citrate can be used in favor of treating renal stones.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Introduction

A large number of people have experienced kidney stones around the world. The lifetime risk of urolithiasis in individuals varies from 10-15% in the developed countries to 20-25% in the Middle East (1). Furthermore, there is a 50% risk of kidney stone reformation within 5-10 years among those experiencing the first episode of renal calculi without applying any medical treatment (2). Consequently, due to the recurrent and unpredictable nature of urinary system stones and their notable prevalence, a great burden has been imposed on the healthcare system and society (3).

Currently, regarding the management of renal stones, open surgery has been less utilized owing to better alternatives, especially extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL), which has revolutionized the treatment of renal stones; however, it may have some complications such as persistent residual stone fragments, infection, and kidney injury which restrict its broad application (4-7). Thus, less attention has been paid to medical therapeutic strategies in these patients, although they are used when there is no favorable response to dietary modifications (8-10).

Based on the results of some studies Potassium Citrate (PC) plays a remarkable role in lessening the odds of renal calculi recurrence through various mechanisms (11-15). Nevertheless, still few studies have been conducted concerning the treatment of renal stones with PC; although, the feasibility of PC administration as an approach for the resolution of urolithiasis should be clarified (8). Therefore, the present study sought to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of PC in the treatment of patients with kidney stones.

 

Methods

Those patients diagnosed with kidney stones below 1cm from 2018 to December 2018 at the Urology Department of Sina hospital participated in the study. The protocol of the study was approved by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20190624043991N6). Patients were recruited for the study after signing the written informed consent.   The exclusion criteria were poor control diabetes, chronic diarrhea, history of digoxin consumption, history of hyperkalemia (potassium>5meq/L), levodopa intake, glomerular filtration rate under 70 ml/min, pregnancy, history of previous renal stones, multiple renal stones, renal transplantation, solitary kidney, cysteine stone, and stones greater than or equal to 1cm. The procedure was described for the patients in detail, and only the patients who signed the written informed consent were considered for participation.

Among the patients, 20 (35%) had two and 36 (65%) had only one kidney stone. The patients’ age and gender, size, and location of the stone, and post-treatment outcome (the stone size) were gathered. The characteristics of renal stones were obtained by ultrasonography or computed tomography scan. A blood sample was drawn for creatinine and glucose level; also, urinary tract infection was ruled out by urine culture for all of the patients. The calculi were divided into upper, middle, and lower calyces stones. Potassium citrate (Alithoral 10, Nooria Darman Pasargad) was administered for all of the subjects three times a day for eight weeks. The same therapeutic technique was repeated for eight more weeks for the patients with undissolved stones. Furthermore, all of the patients were recommended to lessen their sodium and oxalate-rich foods intake, drink at least two liters of water every day and normalize the consumption of calcium. Meanwhile, serum electrolytes and urine pH were measured every 4 weeks. If the urinary pH was greater than 7.2, the agent's dosage is reduced to 20 mEq/day and if it was lower than 6.8, 40 mEq/day is administered. Further, all of the patients were examined in the outpatient setting after 8 weeks from nephrolithiasis diagnosis. To this aim, a precise history was taken from each patient regarding new stone formation signs and symptoms, and abdominal ultrasonography was used to assess the effect of citrate potassium on stone dissolution. All of the sonographies were performed by an expert radiologist at our institution. Finally, the patients whose stones were not dissolved after 8 weeks, were examined with the same protocol.

 

Results

The mean age of the patients was 43.7 ± 10.8 and 29 (51.8%) of the patients were female. The mean body mass index (BMI) of patients was 26.4 ± 2.0 kg/m2 (Table 1). The location of 24 (27.9%), 42 (48.8%), and 20 (23.3%) stones were inferior, middle, and upper calyces, respectively (Table 2). in the first visit, 42 stones were completely dissolved, while just 25 stones were completely dissolved at the time of the second visit. After treatment, the mean size of stones decreased significantly from 5.13 to 1.96 cm (p-value<0.001) in the first visit; additionally among the 39 remaining stones in the second visit, their diameter altered from 6.23 to 1.24 cm (p-value<0.001). Further, the mean stone size decreased significantly from 1.96 to 0.79 cm (p-value<0.001) (Table3).

 

Table 1Basic characteristics of participants

Variable

Participants

Age, Mean (SD)

43.75(10.8)

Sex (Female), n (%)

29 (51.8)

Weight, n (%)

72.4 (7.7)

Height, n (%)

165.3 (7.9)

BMI, n (%)

26.4 (2.0)

Values are presented as mean (SD) or number (percent), SD: Standard deviation, BMI: Body mass index

 

Table 2. Frequency of stones' location

Location

Number

Percent

Inferior Calyces

24

27.9

Middle Calyces

42

48.8

Upper Ccalyces

20

23.3

 

Table 3. Changes of mean stones' size during follow-up

 

Bas Line

After 8 Weeks

After 16 Weeks

Mean Difference

Mean of Stone Size

5.13±177

1.96±2.49

0.79±1.91

 

Mean difference

1

3.17+1.9

---

<0.001

1

---

43±2.35

<0.001

---

1

1.2±2.1

<0.001

 

Taking into account the stone location, the size of middle and lower calyces stones decreased significantly, while no remarkable reduction has occurred in the magnitude of upper calyces stones (p-value= 0.261). Also, no meaningful change was observed in the location of the stones after 16 weeks compared to the baseline value (p-value>0.05).

 

Discussion

The present study focused on the potential applicability of citrate potassium in dissolving renal stones (<1cm), irrespective of their composition. The results indicated that a high proportion of patients with below 1cm kidney calculi got stone-free during two months of follow-up when citrate potassium was applied. Furthermore, none of the patients showed evidence of stone reformation, which is considered a proven fact compared to the results of the previous studies (11, 12, 16, 17).

Li et al reported that 20% of the stones, which were managed conservatively, with the mean size of 5.7mm passed spontaneously after a mean of 46 months of follow-up. In our study, after 16 weeks of the treatment, 88% of renal stones with the mean size of 5.13mm were dissolved, so, it can be concluded that our treatment was efficient enough. Of note, although a low proportion of renal stones did not dissolve with the treatment, their size decreased significantly within two and four months of the treatment compared with the initiation of the treatment (18-21).

Some studies indicated the role of selective long-term treatments for preventing calcium stone recurrence. Based on the results, there is an approximate 39% risk of nephrolithiasis recurrence. However, among the patients who received medical treatment, the odds of the need for surgical intervention are scarce (22-25). Mattle et al. reviewed the importance of alkali citrate in preventing renal stones recurrence, suggesting the rate of stone formation decreased significantly ranging from 47 to 100% among 21 uncontrolled studies with a population of about 1000 patients (26).

Low levels of citrate in urine have been recognized as one of the major risk factors in the formation of kidney calculi. Besides, the administration of citrate preparations can have beneficial effects in minimizing the risk of recurrence among patients with hypocitraturia (22, 27). Among different forms of introduced citrate preparations so far, citrate potassium is considered the most tolerable and effective one (28, 29). Citrate preparations can induce some changes leading to the reduction of the stone formation including an increase in the urinary citrate levels through providing alkali load, modification of the potassium level to prevent hypokalemia, and an increase in the urine pH, which can positively affect uric acid and cysteine stones (30). Additionally, citrate potassium can be used for inhibiting the formation of struvite stones (31).

So far, few studies have evaluated the capacity of potassium citrate in dissolving renal stones, which were performed on uric acid stones (32, 33). Trinchieri et al. assessed the efficacy of potassium citrate/potassium bicarbonate in eight patients with uric acid urinary stones. After six weeks of potassium citrate plus potassium bicarbonate administration, complete dissolution was detected in three patients, while in the remaining, partial dissolution was observed. By prolongation of the treatment, complete dissolution was obtained in two patients by four and six months, respectively (34, 35). The present study was not restricted to specific renal stone types and was performed on 56 randomized patients with 86 stones. Besides, stones with calcium are the most common renal stones (36). In general, citrate potassium is beneficial for dissolving renal stones of different compositions, especially calcium-based renal stones.

It is noteworthy that no major side effect has been reported for alkali citrate treatment and the minor ones are mainly related to the gastrointestinal system. The most reported side effects were eructation/bloating/gaseousness (26%) or diarrhea (12%) (26). The liquid form of potassium citrate compared to its tablets was accompanied by higher rates of complications (33% vs 9.3%) (37). Despite a low rate of complications in tablet form, due to its ineffectiveness in patients with chronic diarrheal syndromes, administration of this type of delivery is limited (38). In the present study, the tablet form of citrate potassium (Alitoral) was used, and few patients reported gastrointestinal adverse effects, which were resolved after providing dietary recommendations.

In the patients who are treated with citrate potassium, due to electrolyte imbalances and urinary pH disturbances, routine follow-up with blood and urine tests is necessary. An increase in urine pH may predispose the patient to the formation of calcium phosphate stones. This type of renal stone has become more prevalent than before, which may be related to the broad use of potassium citrate in this regard, urinary pH was measured every month to keep the patients’ urine pH level between 6.8 and 7.2 by modifying the drug dosage.

The present study had some limitations. First of all, the 24-hour urine metabolic tests were not performed for the patients. Second of all, the present study is a pre-and post-interventional study without any control group with a short follow-up period. To evaluate the potency of potassium citrate in patients with renal stones, further studies with a longer duration of follow-up are warranted.

 

Conclusion

Although the efficacy of potassium citrate in preventing renal stones has been proved, little information is available regarding the therapeutic capacity of potassium citrate in the dissolution of calculi. In conclusion, potassium citrate can be favorably utilized as nonsurgical management in the setting of kidney stones disintegration and reduction of their size.

 

Author's contributions

FG designed the study and analysis, SSTZ wrote the manuscript, MAP analyses the data and edited the manuscript, SE collected the data and run the project, ANSH was the principal investigator who supervised the project.

 

Acknowledgments

 Special thanks to Nooria Darman Pasargad for providing the Alitoral tablets (Alithoral 10).

 

Conflict of interests

All authors claim that there is no competing interest.

 

Funding

 There was no founding.  

 

Ethical statements

The study was performed prospectively under the Tehran University ethical committees after receiving the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20190624043991N6). All patients signed informed consent before enrolling.

 

Data availability

Data will be provided on request.

 

Abbreviations

BMI         Body mass index

ESWL      Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy

PC           Potassium citrate

SFR         Stone free rate

 

  1. Khan SR, Pearle MS, Robertson WG, Gambaro G, Canales BK, Doizi S, et al. Kidney stones. Nature reviews Disease primers. 2016;2(1):1-23.
  2. TRINCHIERI A, OSTINI F, NESPOLI R, ROVERA F, MONTANARI E, ZANETTI G. A prospective study of recurrence rate and risk factors for recurrence after a first renal stone. The Journal of urology. 1999;162(1):27-30.
  3. Raheem OA, Khandwala YS, Sur RL, Ghani KR, Denstedt JD. Burden of urolithiasis: trends in prevalence, treatments, and costs. European urology focus. 2017;3(1):18-26.
  4. Begun F, Knoll C, Gottlieb M, Lawson R. Chronic effects of focused electrohydraulic shock waves on renal function and hypertension. The Journal of urology. 1991;145(3):635-9.
  5. Kishimoto T, Yamamoto K, Sugimoto T, Yoshihara H, Maekawa M. Side effects of extracorporeal shock-wave exposure in patients treated by extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stone. European urology. 1986;12:308-13.
  6. Aghamir SMK, Elmimehr R, Modaresi SS, Salavati A. Comparing bleeding complications of double and single access totally tubeless PCNL: is it safe to obtain more accesses? Urologia internationalis. 2016;96(1):73-6.
  7. Jafari Shahdani MR, Fattahi B, Mohseni MG, Aghamir SMK. Comparison of Mini-perc and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Residual Stone Fragments with Hounsfield Unit after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Translational Research Urology. 2021;3(2):40-4.
  8. Ludwig WW, Matlaga BR. Urinary stone disease: diagnosis, medical therapy, and surgical management. Medical Clinics. 2018;102(2):265-77.
  9. Aghamir SM, Hamidi M, Salavati A, Mohammadi A, Farahmand H, Meysamie AP, et al. Is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary in patients undergoing ureterolithotripsy? Acta medica Iranica. 2011;49(8):513-6.
  10. Mohseni MG, M HK, Aghamir SM, Biniaz F. Changes in intrarenal resistive index following electromagnetic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urology journal. 2007;4(4):217-20.
  11. Preminger GM, Sakhaee K, Skurla C, Pak CY. Prevention of recurrent calcium stone formation with potassium citrate therapy in patients with distal renal tubular acidosis. The Journal of urology. 1985;134(1):20-3.
  12. Zerwekh JE, Odvina CV, Wuermser L-A, Pak CY. Reduction of renal stone risk by potassium-magnesium citrate during 5 weeks of bed rest. The Journal of urology. 2007;177(6):2179-84.
  13. Mirsadeghi SA, Tamehri Zadeh SS, Fakhr Yasseri A, Tabibi A, Radfar MH, Taheri D. Comparison of the Tamsulosin and Tolterodine Effectiveness in Stent-Related Symptoms Reduction. 2021;3(1):23-31.
  14. Aghamir SMK, Dadkhah Tehrani F, Khatami F, Zia H. Second-look Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Access to the Tract with Direct Vision and Fluoroscopic Guidance. 2020;2(4):118-22.
  15. Fakhr Yasseri A, Taheri D. Measuring Stone Free Rate after Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Radiography, Ultrasound, or CT scan? 2020;2(2):48-50.
  16. Whitson PA, Pietrzyk RA, Jones JA, Nelman-Gonzalez M, Hudson EK, Sams CF. Effect of potassium citrate therapy on the risk of renal stone formation during spaceflight. The Journal of urology. 2009;182(5):2490-6.
  17. Fakhr Yasseri A, Saatchi M, Abedi Yarandi V. Optimal Time of Ureteral Catheter Removal after Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. Translational Research Urology. 2021;3(2):54-8.
  18. Li X, Zhu W, Lam W, Yue Y, Duan H, Zeng G. Outcomes of long‐term follow‐up of asymptomatic renal stones and prediction of stone‐related events. BJU international. 2019;123(3):485-92.
  19. Zia H, Khatami F, Rahimi MR, Aghamir SMK. Combined Direct Visual and Imaging Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Novel Technique. Translational Research Urology. 2021;3(1):4-9.
  20. Fakhr Yasseri A, Taheri D. Measuring Stone Free Rate after Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Radiography, Ultrasound, or CT scan? Translational Research Urology. 2020;2(2):48-50.
  21. Shabaninia S, Yahyazadeh SR, Mousavi A, Kasaeian A. The Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Treated with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy According to the Preoperative Renal Function Levels. Translational Research Urology. 2020;2(1):4-8.
  22. Preminger GM, Harvey JA, Pak CY. Comparative efficacy of “specific” potassium citrate therapy versus conservative management in nephrolithiasis of mild to moderate severity. The Journal of urology. 1985;134(4):658-61.
  23. Fakhr Yasseri A, Mohammadi A, Aghamir SMK. Management of a Lost Stone During Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: Video Article. Translational Research Urology. 2021;3(1):38-9.
  24. Aghamir SMK, Dadkhah Tehrani F, Khatami F, Zia H. Second-look Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Access to the Tract with Direct Vision and Fluoroscopic Guidance. Translational Research Urology. 2020;2(4):118-22.
  25. Fakhr Yasseri A, Hamidi M, Aghamir SMK. Comparison of Stone-Free Rates after Ureteroscopic Pneumatic Lithotripsy in Impacted vs. Non-Impacted upper Ureteral Stones. Translational Research Urology. 2019;1(2):79-83.
  26. Mattle D, Hess B. Preventive treatment of nephrolithiasis with alkali citrate—a critical review. Urological research. 2005;33(2):73-9.
  27. PAK CY, FULLER C. Idiopathic hypocitraturic calcium-oxalate nephrolithiasis successfully treated with potassium citrate. Annals of internal medicine. 1986;104(1):33-7.
  28. Ettinger B, Pak CY, Citron JT, Thomas C, Adams-Huet B, Vangessel A. Potassium-magnesium citrate is an effective prophylaxis against recurrent calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. The Journal of urology. 1997;158(6):2069-73.
  29. Preminger GM, Sakhaee K, Pak CY. Alkali action on the urinary crystallization of calcium salts: contrasting responses to sodium citrate and potassium citrate. The Journal of urology. 1988;139(2):240-2.
  30. Hamm LL, Hering-Smith KS. Pathophysiology of hypocitraturic nephrolithiasis. Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics. 2002;31(4):885-93.
  31. Das P, Gupta G, Velu V, Awasthi R, Dua K, Malipeddi H. Formation of struvite urinary stones and approaches towards the inhibition—A review. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2017;96:361-70.
  32. Uhlíř K. The peroral dissolution of renal calculi. The Journal of Urology. 1970;104(2):239-47.
  33. Alsinnawi M, Maan Z, Rix G. Oral dissolution therapy for radiolucent kidney stones. An old treatment revisited. Journal of Clinical Urology. 2016;9(4):268-73.
  34. Trinchieri A, Esposito N, Castelnuovo C. Dissolution of radiolucent renal stones by oral alkalinization with potassium citrate/potassium bicarbonate. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2009;81(3):188-91.
  35. Aghamir SMK, Salavati A, Hamidi M, FallahNejad A. Primary Report of Totally Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Despite Pelvi-calyceal Perforations. Urology journal. 2017;14(4):4020-3.
  36. Bangash K, Shigri F, Jamal A, Anwar K. Spectrum of renal stones composition; chemical analysis of renal stones. International Journal of Pathology. 2011;9(2):63-6.
  37. Granchi D, Caudarella R, Ripamonti C, Spinnato P, Bazzocchi A, Massa A, et al. Potassium citrate supplementation decreases the biochemical markers of bone loss in a group of osteopenic women: the results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Nutrients. 2018;10(9):1293.
  38. Wiegand A, Fischer G, Seeger H, Fuster D, Dhayat N, Bonny O, et al. Impact of potassium citrate on urinary risk profile, glucose and lipid metabolism of kidney stone formers in Switzerland. Clinical kidney journal. 2020;13(6):1037-48.